Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Economic Times
The Economic Times

'SC gate par kya lagana hai, hum dekh lenge': CJI dismisses plea on Ashok Chakra emblem

New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to entertain a plea concerning the installation of the Ashok Chakra (National Emblem) on the building of the apex court, with Chief Justice of India Surya Kant remarking that the court itself would decide such matters.

Hearing a plea filed by petitioner-in-person Badaravada Venugopal, also known as Baba Khatarnak, the CJI said, "'Supreme Court ke gate pe kya lagana hai hum dekh lenge... aap duniya mein itni samasyaein hai unka dhyan rakhiye' (We will decide what should be placed at the Supreme Court gate; there are so many problems in the world, focus on those)."

Read more: Supreme Court says peaceful protest is a constitutional right, questions police excesses

The plea related to the installation of the National Emblem on the main dome of the Supreme Court, and what the petitioner described as the "constitutional identity of courts".

According to the court record, Venugopal had earlier moved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions on the issue.

On March 23, the Supreme Court disposed of the petition, observing that the matter essentially required examination on the administrative side and directing the secretary general of the court to place an appropriate note before the competent authority.

Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application seeking the status and effective implementation of the administrative directions issued by the court on March 23 concerning the installation of the National Emblem on the apex court's main dome.

Read more: NEET protest violence: SC orders safeguards for protesters' digital data, release of under-18 detainees

The application was lodged by the registrar on July 3 under the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Venugopal then filed an appeal against the registrar's order, which came up before the bench on Tuesday.

The bench, however, was not inclined to interfere and rejected the plea, indicating that issues relating to what is displayed on the Supreme Court premises fall within the court's own administrative domain.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.