Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Economic Times
The Economic Times
Ramneek Kundra

Retirement planning: Why costs, asset allocation, and compounding matter more than chasing returns

Two people can earn the exact same average return over 30 years and still retire into vastly different lives. The one who runs into a market crash in his first year of retirement, and the one who meets the same crash in his last, end up worlds apart. This is the quiet cruelty of retirement investing. You do not get to live the average of all possible outcomes. You get one life, in one sequence, and the order in which the good and bad years arrive can matter as much as the returns themselves.

The good thing is that the two levers that decide most retirement outcomes are under your control. Cost, and how you split your money between equity and debt. Neither requires you to pick winning stocks or time the market. Start with cost, the surest edge in finance. The National Pension System (NPS) limits fund management charges near 0.09% a year. A typical equity mutual fund charges 1-2%. Over a 30-year corpus, that gap is not a rounding error. It is a large slice of your final number, compounded away in silence. Warren Buffett has been saying it for 50 years: fees are the tapeworm of returns. NPS also rebalances inside the account with no capital gains tax on switching, sparing you a cost most investors never even notice they are paying.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.