Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
ABC News
ABC News
Business

NT pastoralist takes Sweetpea Petroleum to Supreme Court over fracking exploration access agreement

Regional traditional owner Johnny Wilson and station manager Andrew Stubbs want fracking stopped at Tanumbirini Station. (ABC Rural: Max Rowley)

A cattle station owner trying to stop a gas company from fracking on his property has taken his fight to the Supreme Court.

Gas company Sweetpea Petroleum began preparatory works for fracking at Tanumbirini Station in the gas-rich Beetaloo Basin last month.

Stretching across an area more than twice the size of Tasmania, the basin - 400 kilometres south of Darwin - contains enough shale gas to power Australia for an estimated 200 years.

A two-day hearing began in Darwin on Monday morning, with lawyers appealing a decision which allowed fracking exploration to go ahead. 

The decision was made by the NT Civil and Administrative Tribunal in May, which granted Sweetpea an access agreement to begin exploration work on the cattle station, owned by Rallen Australia. 

It allowed Sweetpea to cut a fence at Tanumbirini Station and move machinery onto two paddocks at the property, despite the opposition of the cattle station owners.

Earlier this year Sweetpea moved heavy earthmoving equipment to Tanumbirini Station. (Facebook: Nurrdalinji Aboriginal Corporation)

Rallen Australia will receive a minimum of $15,000 compensation per gas well drilled on the property as a part of the agreement.

Tanumbirini station owner and Rallen Australia Director Pierre Langenhoven said Sweetpea had shown "flagrant disrespect" undertaking exploration work in the face of his company's opposition.

Station owner Pierre Langenhoven said the gas company's preliminary works were causing "havoc". (ABC News: Hamish Harty)

"Its operations are already causing havoc," Mr Langenhoven said.

"They have cut our fences, bulldozed access routes and flaunted their own plans for protecting our stock and managing weeds."

The chief executive of Sweetpea's parent company, Tamboran Resources, said the company was working within the approved terms of the access agreement and had worked closely with all stakeholders.

"Pastoral lease and exploration lease holders are granted overlapping tenures by the Northern Territory," Joel Riddle said.

"These lease holders have come to agreements across the Northern Territory and Australia successfully over many decades to manage their dual rights over public land and will continue to do so to the mutual benefit of industry, traditional owners and the environment."

Sweetpea Petroleum is one of several gas companies exploring the viability of the Beetaloo's sub-basin. (Supplied: Tamboran Resources Limited)

First legal test of new laws

Lawyers for the cattle station owner said the case would be a test of new land access laws, passed in 2020, to try to balance the interests of the pastoral and gas industries.

The laws gave the tribunal power to impose access arrangements if negotiating parties could not reach an agreement.

"We have some serious concerns about the adequacy of the agreement and so the appeal to this court is testing the new process," lawyer Kathy Merrick said.

The lawyers are arguing the access agreement imposes lesser standards on Sweetpea than the standard minimum protections required under Northern Territory law, and fails to balance the interests of the cattle station and gas company.

The pastoralists say the agreement granted does not strike the right balance of interests. (Supplied: Original Power)

"The petroleum industries argue that they have entitlements, but their entitlements are to minerals under the earth and my client's entitlements are to operate a business without interruption on the surface," Ms Merrick said. 

"To have an explorer argue that cutting the surface of the land up to get access to the assets below doesn't result in the interference is something that we struggle with."

Tamboran Resources' chief executive Joel Riddle said there was a need to balance the rights of competing interests.

It's the first case brought to the NT Supreme Court to test the access laws passed in 2020. (Che Chorley)

Concern over long-term future of cattle station

Mr Langenhoven said he was concerned about the long-term viability of the cattle station if the access agreement was upheld.

"I don't have an issue with them sharing the land, but I've got an issue with them dictating how we can use the land," he said.

"It's different if they come and consult us and actually understand our business, understand what it takes to run a cattle business, and sit down and make plans how we can do it together.

"But to date, it's their way or no way.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.