A key government document outlining the impact of the $1.6bn plan to raise the Warragamba Dam wall was changed to make the project’s consequences for an area of world heritage-listed environment appear “less definite”.
The robustness of a peer review of an environmental impact statement (EIS) may also have been “compromised” because the agency charged with getting approval for the dam raising, WaterNSW, did not act “in accordance with best practice”.