Downing Street has denied that Boris Johnson urged the senior civil servant investigating lockdown parties in Whitehall to drop plans to publish her report.
The Times reported that the Prime Minister suggested to Sue Gray at a meeting earlier this month that there was no longer any point in releasing her findings as the facts were “all out there”.
However, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said he did not recognise “that characterisation” of what was a private meeting and that Mr Johnson wants the report to be published.
“This was a legitimate meeting about the process (of publication) rather than the contents of report,” the spokesman said.
“The Prime Minister wants the report to be published. He is looking forward to that at the conclusion of the report and it being put in the public domain.
“The Prime Minister did not ask her to drop the report or not proceed with the report. It was the Prime Minister who commissioned the report. He wants the report to be published.”
Ms Gray is expected to release her findings as early as Wednesday amid widespread expectation that she will heavily criticise the culture in No 10 which led to repeated violations of Covid restrictions.
Earlier, Transport Secretary Grant Shapps insisted that Mr Johnson did not believe he was at a lockdown-breaking party in the images showing him raising a glass and surrounded by colleagues and wine bottles.
Mr Shapps said he was “angry” to see the photographs but suggested the Prime Minister may not have been fined over the event because he left the leaving do “pretty quick”.
The Transport Secretary argued that Mr Johnson had only “popped down” to toast departing communications chief Lee Cain on November 13 2020.
The leaving do took place just days after the Prime Minister had ordered England’s second national lockdown.
Mr Johnson, who the Transport Secretary claimed was “mortified” by the latest revelations, was facing fresh allegations he lied to Parliament after ITV News published the images.
Scotland Yard was also facing calls to explain why Mr Johnson was not fined over that event when photos showed him, drink in hand, by a table strewn with food and wine bottles.
There were at least eight other people in the room at a time when people were banned from social mixing, other than to meet one person outside, and at least one individual has received a fine over an event on that date.
Mr Shapps pointed to Mr Johnson’s red ministerial box being present in the images as he claimed to Sky News the Prime Minister was “clearly not” partying.
“It looks to me like he goes down on his way out of the office and thanks the staff and raises a glass, and doesn’t in his mind recognise it as a party,” Mr Shapps said.
The Transport Secretary told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme he was “angry” to see the images, but sought to explain why Mr Johnson was not fined over that event.
He said he presumes the Prime Minister “comes in and out pretty quick, which is presumably why the police have not issued a fixed penalty notice to the Prime Minister for that event”.
London mayor Sadiq Khan was among those calling for Scotland Yard to explain why Mr Johnson only received a single fine for breaching lockdown rules with his 56th birthday gathering.
The Labour politician told Today “the police should explain why they reached their conclusions and provide that clarity” in order to command public confidence.
The Liberal Democrats have urged the Independent Office for Police Conduct to examine the Met’s Operation Hillman inquiry into events in No 10 and Whitehall.
But Mr Shapps said the Met does not need to explain its rationale, saying: “I don’t think the police should provide running commentaries, no.”
He insisted to ITV’s Good Morning Britain the Prime Minister “did not knowingly lie” to Parliament when he repeatedly denied rule-breaking parties took place in No 10.
Mr Johnson was facing fresh pressure from Conservatives over the latest revelations.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross demanded the Prime Minister explain why he believed his behaviour was “acceptable” when most people would think the pictures showed “unjustifiable and wrong” behaviour.
Conservative MP David Simmonds said he was awaiting Ms Gray’s report but that it will be “very difficult” for Mr Johnson to explain how he did not mislead Parliament.
“Clearly it does raise a new question that we were all told very clearly that there definitely had not been a party on the day in question and these photographs have emerged which suggest that that’s not the case,” the backbencher told Today.
“It seems to me he could construct some defence about how people were at work, but we need to see this in context. Many of my constituents lost relatives, they lost friends and family members, my father-in-law died of Covid.”
