Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Economic Times
The Economic Times
National
Team Global

More trees do not always mean more birds, and a Japanese study found grassland species fell by over 70% near shelterbelts, showing that restoring habitat can sometimes reduce biodiversity

Most of us were probably taught that planting trees is good for the planet, good for the climate, good for wildlife, good for all of it. So it might come as a surprise to learn that in some landscapes, planting trees can actually cause bird populations to plummet dramatically. That is the precise argument of a new study, and the implications reach far beyond Japan, where the research was done.

According to a study, ‘Shelterbelts support edge birds but limit grassland and wetland specialists in agricultural landscape,’ published in the Journal of Environmental Management by a multidisciplinary team of researchers from institutions including Hiroshima University, the University of Tokyo, Kyoto University, and the University of British Columbia, rows of trees planted on farmland as windbreaks, known as shelterbelts, significantly reduce the abundance and diversity of open grassland and wetland bird species. The results are a blow to one of the most common assumptions in agricultural conservation, that planting trees on farmland is an easy win for biodiversity.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.