Your piece on “affordable commuter hotspots” was a welcome reminder that, in Britain, affordability is now a theoretical concept best observed from a moving train (Revealed: the new affordable commuter hotspots in Great Britain, 7 March). Only here could a house become “affordable” the moment you attach a season ticket priced like a minor surgical procedure. It’s the sort of logic that would make sense only to someone who has never attempted either.
We’ve quietly accepted that the solution to unaffordable housing is … distance. Not building homes, not reforming planning, just encouraging people to live far enough away that the numbers look respectable on a spreadsheet. The towns newly crowned as “affordable” are simply the latest recipients of metropolitan overflow, rewarded with more commuters and none of the infrastructure.
A more accurate headline might have been: “Where to live if you enjoy trains more than your home.” At least it would be honest.
Richard Eltringham
Leicester
• As a resident of Bamford, in the Peak District, I feel a sense of pride and smugness that you featured our village in your venerable organ last Saturday. However, there is one significant downside that you failed to warn potential buyers about. On every fine weekend and bank holiday they will be subjected to a remorseless barrage of noise from motorcyclists who seem to think that we all want to hear the deafening din of their petrol beasts and use our village as a race track. I long for the day when all motorbikes have to be electric (and as a result, 90% of today’s bikers sell their bikes and do something else, hopefully quieter, instead).
Name and address supplied
• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
