So Buckingham Palace is no longer needed by the monarchy (Report, 25 June) and the Houses of Parliament are no longer fit for purpose. How about a temporary move for the latter into the former while waiting for a new building, ideally in Birmingham or Manchester (real devolution).
In this way, taxpayers might see some benefit from the £369m spent on the former royal residence. Part of it could still be used for ceremonial purposes. To be honest, though, it’s the symbolism that appeals – a change of ownership and purpose to signify a long overdue move to more meritocratic government.
Richard Churcher
London
• Given that the king and queen will not live at Buckingham Palace but want there to be increased public access, could I suggest it becomes a Wetherspoon’s? They specialise in running pubs in historic buildings.
Keith Flett
London
• What now for Buckingham Palace? Perhaps an heir B&B?
Jude Carr
London
• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
