Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Eugene Volokh

Magistrate Judge Recommends Not Dismissing Prosecution of Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan for Allegedly Interfering with Immigration Arrest

From yesterday's report and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph (E.D. Wisc.) in U.S. v. Dugan:

The indictment charges as follows:

[Count One:] On or about April 18, 2025, Dugan knowingly concealed E.F.R., a person for whose arrest a warrant and process had been issued under the provisions of the law of the United States, so as to prevent the discovery and arrest of E.F.R., after notice and knowledge of the fact that a warrant and process had been issued for the apprehension of E.F.R., in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1071[.]

[Count Two:] On or about April 18, 2025, Dugan did corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct, and impede the due and proper administration of the law under which a pending proceeding was being had before a department and agency of the United States, namely the administrative arrest of E.F.R. for purposes of removal proceedings conducted by the United States Department of Homeland Security, by committing affirmative acts to assist E.F.R. to evade arrest, including:

  1. confronting members of a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Task Force and falsely telling them they needed a judicial warrant to effectuate the arrest of E.F.R.;
  2. upon learning that they had an administrative warrant for E.F.R.'s arrest, directing all identified members of the ICE Task Force to leave the location of the planned arrest (a public hallway outside of Courtroom 615 of the Milwaukee County Courthouse) and go to the Chief Judge's office;
  3. addressing E.F.R.'s Milwaukee County Circuit Court criminal case off the record while ICE Task Force members were in the Chief Judge's office;
  4. directing E.F.R. and his counsel to exit Courtroom 615 through a non-public jury door; and
  5. advising E.F.R.'s counsel that E.F.R. could appear by "Zoom" for his next court date

[i]n violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505….

Dugan sought to dismiss the indictment, on the grounds that her actions were protected by judicial immunity; the Magistrate Judge went through a long analysis of the precedents on judicial immunity (dating back to 1607), and summarized it thus:

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.