Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
World

Like it or not, we all bear some responsibility for slavery

Meeting of the World Anti-Slavery Convention, Exeter Hall, London, 1840, oil on canvas by Benjamin Robert Haydon
The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840 – an oil on canvas by Benjamin Robert Haydon. It depicts the first meeting of the World Anti-Slavery Convention at Exeter Hall in London, in June 1840. Photograph: Pictures from History/Universal Images Group/Getty Images

“My ancestors gained nothing from slavery,” writes John Cookson (Letters, 15 March). Sadly, he is wrong. Everyone in Britain and the rest of the developed world has benefited from at least 200 years of cheap tobacco, coffee, chocolate and, above all, tea and sugar, produced by slaves or indentured labourers (or, today, low-paid workers) in conditions even worse than those his forebears experienced in Manchester and Salford in the 1840s. In addition, they were probably paid to make clothes out of raw cotton grown by slaves in the southern United States.

The direct responsibility for slavery certainly lies with the slavers and plantation owners, including the British royal family and most of the aristocracy and merchant classes who invested in the hateful trade. But the moral responsibility has to be borne much more widely and should be in our minds whenever we buy “cheap” goods today.
Prof Sir Roderick Floud
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.