When mountain runner Michelino Sunseri climbed and descended Grand Teton in record time last September, he posted information about his route on social media. According to the National Park Service (NPS) and the Justice Department, Sunseri thereby implicated himself in a federal misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail.
Although the NPS later reconsidered its recommendation that Sunseri should be prosecuted for his seemingly inadvertent use of an unapproved trail, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Wyoming tried Sunseri anyway. Two members of the House Judiciary Committee recently decried that baffling decision, saying it "appears to be a prime example of the problem of overcriminalization"—a problem that President Donald Trump is avowedly keen to address.
Sunseri's bench trial concluded on May 21, and U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephanie Hambrick has not announced her verdict yet. But Reps. Harriet Hageman (R–Wyo.) and Andy Biggs (R–Ariz.) want to know why federal prosecutors decided to pursue the case, especially in light of Trump's May 9 executive order urging restraint in deploying criminal penalties for regulatory violations.
