For the past few weeks, Gwyneth Paltrow has been making headlines in connection to her highly publicized trial over a ski crash that occurred in 2016. The case featured a number of notable moments, including one in which Paltrow was asked to act out the situation. The court proceedings ultimately concluded this past week, with Paltrow receiving a winning verdict and being awarded a small monetary sum. In the aftermath, the public has heard comments from the retired actress herself as well as the individual who filed suit against her, Terry Sanderson. Now, one of the jurors in the trial is speaking out in the hopes to make one thing absolutely clear about the case.
Gwyneth Paltrow is far from the first Hollywood star to be involved in a lawsuit with a non-celebrity. In a number of instances, said actors and media personalities have emerged victorious from their legal entanglements. However, in some cases, the public may question whether the defendant or plaintiff’s star power factored into their legal win. Well, Samantha Imrie – who served as Juror No. 11 on Paltrow’s case – wants it known that the jury didn’t express favoritism when determining a verdict. On that note, the 31-year-old Imrie explained the logic that went into that ultimate decision:
