Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Comment
Rachel Cooke

Jesse Darling blaming Margaret Thatcher for arts cuts is as inaccurate as it’s outdated

Jesse Darling pictured next to one of his installations on display at the Towner in Eastbourne.
Turner prize winner Jesse Darling, with installation at the Towner in Eastbourne. Photograph: Andrew Hasson/The Guardian

These retro times. No sooner had I finished stowing the candles I’d bought on the advice of the deputy prime minister, Oliver Dowden, who believes we should all prepare for darkness, than the latest winner of the Turner prize, Jesse Darling, was complaining in his acceptance speech of Margaret Thatcher, who had, he said, removed art from schools on the grounds it was not “economically viable”. Crikey. This was truly dizzying. Had I gone too early on the Warninks, or, like season nine of Dallas, had the last three decades merely been an extended dream?

Leaving aside the fact that when Thatcher resigned in 1990, Darling was nine, such talk, received so rapturously (and so unquestioningly) by the art world, seems very odd to me. There are plenty of people, elected and non-elected, who are far more deserving of our ire when it comes to the arts right now. Unlike Thatcher, they’re alive and kicking, and mostly went themselves to expensive schools where words like impasto and Velázquez doubtless flowed freely from the mouths of teachers, and flashy walk-in kilns were standard.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.