Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Jacob Sullum

James Comey Says His Grudge-Driven Prosecution Is Unconstitutional Retaliation for His Criticism of Trump

A year after Donald Trump fired him, former FBI Director James Comey published a memoir that compared the president to a mafioso, portraying him as "a deeply flawed person and leader" who "either didn't know" or "didn't care" that federal law enforcement officials have a higher duty than obedience to the president's whims. The grudge-driven criminal case against Comey reinforces that assessment.

In recent motions challenging his perjury and obstruction indictment, Comey argues that he is a victim of vindictive and selective prosecution, that the interim U.S. attorney who obtained the indictment was improperly appointed, and that the charges against him are legally deficient. All three claims stem from Trump's open determination to punish Comey based on a personal vendetta. Trump's own statements therefore provide the strongest evidence in Comey's favor.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.