Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Kiplinger
Kiplinger
Business
Christopher C. Giambrone, CFP®, AIF®

Is Your Retirement Plan Built for 2026 — or Stuck in 2006?

(Image credit: Getty Images)

As a financial planner, I see a familiar scene play out often. A new client settles into a chair, opens a thick, leather-bound binder and places it proudly on our conference room table.

It's their "master plan." It's been carefully followed for years — and it shows commitment and discipline.

But as we start paging through it together, it usually becomes clear that we aren't just reviewing a plan. We're revisiting a moment in time.

That doesn't mean the plan was bad. In fact, many of these strategies were thoughtful, well-constructed and perfectly appropriate when they were created. The challenge is that the world they were designed for no longer exists.

The financial reality of 2026 looks very different from 2006. Back then, the iPhone hadn't arrived, "social media" meant MySpace, and the Great Recession was still unimaginable.

Just as technology has evolved, retirement planning has had to evolve with it.

The question isn't whether your plan was once solid — it's whether it has kept pace.

Rethinking the 'safe' withdrawal rate

For years, the 4% rule was a comforting benchmark. Withdraw 4% in year one, adjust for inflation thereafter, and the odds suggested your money would last 30 years.

Today, we approach that guideline with more flexibility. People are living longer, retirements are lasting longer, and market volatility — especially early in retirement — can have an outsized impact on long-term outcomes.

Rather than relying on a single fixed number, many plans now incorporate guardrails. In strong market years, spending can increase modestly. In weaker years, we may pause discretionary expenses.

The goal isn't restriction — it's resilience. Security today often comes from adaptability, not rigidity.

From tax deferral to tax strategy

In the mid-2000s, deferring taxes was often the default approach. Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s offered immediate tax benefits, and many retirees expected to be in a lower tax bracket later.

Fast-forward to today, and taxes deserve a more nuanced conversation. With changing tax laws and rising government debt, flexibility has become more valuable than ever.

Instead of relying on a single tax bucket, modern plans often focus on building a tax-diversified structure — balancing taxable, tax-deferred and tax-free accounts. This allows retirees to manage income more intentionally over time, rather than reacting to tax surprises.

It's less about predicting the future — and more about staying prepared for it.

The evolution of the 60/40 portfolio

For decades, the 60/40 stock-and-bond portfolio was the foundation of retirement planning. Bonds provided income and stability, often moving differently from stocks.

Today, markets behave differently. Stocks and bonds don't always offset each other the way they once did, and inflation has re-entered the conversation in a meaningful way.

While the 60/40 framework still has relevance, many plans now emphasize income sources rather than simple asset ratios — combining Social Security, dividend growth, cash reserves and other tools to create stability through market cycles.

The focus has shifted from balance alone to sustainability.

Health care: Now a central planning pillar

Health care was once treated as just another line item. Today, it's one of the most dynamic — and potentially impactful — parts of a retirement plan.

Rising medical costs, long-term care considerations and tools like health savings accounts have changed how we plan. HSAs, when used strategically, can serve as a powerful resource for future medical expenses.

Modern long-term care solutions also look very different than the "use it or lose it" policies of the past.

Planning for health care today is less about assumptions and more about intentional preparation.

Two eras, two approaches

Earlier Planning Focus

Today’s Planning Focus

Goal

Accumulating assets

Creating reliable income

Inflation

Secondary concern

Core portfolio risk

Longevity

Planning to mid-80s

Planning well into the 90s

Strategy

Set it and forget it

Ongoing adjustments

Legacy

Whatever remains

Intentional, tax-aware planning

Is it time for a refresh?

If your current review conversations don't include topics like tax diversification, sequence of returns risk or Medicare income thresholds, your plan may simply be overdue for an update — not because it failed, but because time moved on.

Retirement isn't a single moment — it's a multidecade journey. The strategies that helped you accumulate wealth are often not the same ones that help you live confidently on it.

That old binder doesn't need to be discarded. It just needs to be brought forward.

Your future self will thank you for it.

Related Content

This article was written by and presents the views of our contributing adviser, not the Kiplinger editorial staff. You can check adviser records with the SEC or with FINRA.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.