Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
World

Irish people sent to the Caribbean were not enslaved

The Emancipation Statue symbolizing the breaking of the chains of slavery at the moment of emancipation in 2021 in Bridgetown, Barbados
Bridgetown, Barbados. ‘In various legal codes, most famously the Barbados Slave Code of 1661, they were clearly defined as servants, not slaves.’ Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Robert Godsill (Letters, 11 April) is right to say that the connection between England’s rulers and slavery goes back further than William III. However, in referring to the Drogheda massacre of 1649 – Oliver Cromwell’s sacking of the city during his invasion to destroy the Irish Confederation – he is wrong to say that the lord protector sent many of the survivors to Barbados as slaves.

Ireland was the grisly theatre of England’s first colony and the laboratory in which it perfected its strategies of colonial atrocities against civilian populations. The Irish were displaced from their land, suffered through English-engineered famines and massacred on a regular basis, all in the name of English imperialism. Queen Elizabeth’s lord deputy of Ireland, Arthur Chichester, declared that Irish “barbarism gives us cause to think them unworthy of other treatment than to be made perpetual slaves to Her Majesty”. Despite this, while thousands of Irish people were deported to the Caribbean, none were actually enslaved.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.