
- Intel’s sub-$200 CPUs now deliver performance once reserved for far pricier processors
- Core Ultra 5 chips pressure AMD by pairing clocks with multicore results
- AMD’s Ryzen 9 5900XT struggles to justify pricing against newer Intel alternatives
I've spotted something interesting in the low end of the desktop CPU market - right now, some of the fastest processors you can buy for around $200 come from Intel, not AMD, and the performance gap is uncomfortable enough to raise an intriguing question: Is Intel starting to look like the old AMD, the company that wins by offering more performance for less money?