Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Economic Times
The Economic Times
National

In 2016, Indiana found very poor fish health in 1.27 miles of Big Branch after years of pollution. 7 years later, its fish score reached 48 and the segment was cleared

A small stream in southwestern Indiana has become a striking example of how long-term watershed restoration can reverse ecological damage. In 2016, monitoring of a 1.27-mile section of Big Branch in Sullivan County revealed a severely degraded fish community. The stream’s Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) score was just 18, a level classified as very poor. Seven years later, follow-up monitoring produced a dramatically different result: the fish IBI had climbed to 48, rated good, while habitat quality also improved substantially. The recovery has prompted Indiana environmental officials to recommend removing the segment from the state’s impaired-waters list for 2026.

Big Branch is part of the Mud Creek–Big Branch watershed within the larger Busseron Creek watershed. The approximately four-mile stream passes through a landscape dominated by forests, farmland, hay and pasture. Indiana Department of Environmental Management monitoring had identified ecological concerns, particularly elevated turbidity and total suspended solids. Agricultural runoff and historical pollution sources contributed to the biological degradation. Although the habitat assessment in 2016 was considered good, the fish community told a different story, demonstrating why water-quality restoration cannot rely on habitat appearance alone.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.