Jurors in the criminal case against Hunter Biden will resume deliberations on Tuesday in Wilmington, Delaware. The case revolves around a gun that President Joe Biden's son purchased in 2018 while allegedly battling a crack cocaine addiction. The jury deliberated for less than an hour on Monday before adjourning.
The prosecution has accused Hunter Biden of lying on a form at the gun shop by denying he was an unlawful drug user or addicted to drugs. Prosecutors presented evidence including testimony from his ex-wife and former girlfriends, as well as photos of him with drug paraphernalia to support their case.
While Hunter Biden's substance abuse issues following his brother Beau's death in 2015 are well-documented, the defense argues that he did not consider himself an addict at the time of the gun purchase. They highlighted his completion of a rehabilitation program in August 2018 and testimony from witnesses, including his daughter Naomi, who noted his efforts to improve.
The defense emphasized that no one witnessed Hunter Biden using drugs during the 11 days he possessed the gun before it was discovered by Beau's widow, Hallie. Prosecutors, however, presented text messages and alleged cocaine residue on the gun's pouch as evidence against him.
First Lady Jill Biden and other family members have been present in court throughout the trial. The defense rested its case without calling Hunter Biden to testify. The prosecutor urged jurors to focus on the evidence and disregard the presence of the president's family in the courtroom.
The trial, taking place in Delaware where the Biden family has deep roots, has attracted significant attention. Hunter Biden did not testify but excerpts from his memoir were played, detailing his struggles with addiction and eventual sobriety.
The case stems from a federal investigation into Hunter Biden's business dealings, which led to his indictment after a proposed plea deal fell through. If convicted, he could face up to 25 years in prison, though the final sentence would be at the judge's discretion.