Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Sports Illustrated
Sports Illustrated
Sport
Kevin Sweeney

How NCAA Tournament Expansion Would Have Changed Last Four Events

The discussion around expanding March Madness has not quieted down even after the Division I basketball committees decided to take no action last week. | Nick Tre. Smith-Imagn Images

The debate over NCAA tournament expansion continues to rage on, with the NCAA men’s and women’s basketball committees meeting last week to discuss plans to add four or eight teams to the field.

While wildly unpopular with fans of the sport (one poll on X by prominent college hoops personality Rob Dauster showed just under 94% disapproval of the concept), expansion has more popularity among college sports administrators and some coaches. Without significant new media rights money on the table, the main case for expansion as explained by many in positions of authority is “access.” The NCAA tournament is one of the most exclusive American postseason events, with fewer than 20% of the now 365 Division I teams getting an invite. That said, among the most common criticisms expressed is that an expanded field would only further cater to power-conference teams and still leave behind top mid-majors that often just miss the cut on Selection Sunday.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.