Michael Gove has defended Rishi Sunak’s controversial transgender jibe, saying the Prime Minister was “absolutely right” to use it to attack Sir Keir Starmer’s U-turns.
Mr Sunak faced a backlash after he accused the Labour leader in the Commons of being incapable of “defining a woman” while Esther Ghey, the mother of murdered transgender teenager Brianna Ghey, was visiting Parliament.
Some Tory MPs conceded that the Prime Minister had made a mistake, with Commons leader Penny Mordaunt suggesting he should “reflect on” his remarks.
Asked whether he agreed with his Cabinet colleague Ms Mordaunt, Mr Gove told Sky News’ Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: “No.
“I think that the Prime Minister was more likely drawing attention to the fact that Keir Starmer has U-turned 60 times.
“I think that the Prime Minister was absolutely right to draw attention to that.”
Mr Sunak has refused to apologise despite Brianna’s father Peter Spooner demanding he say sorry for the “dehumanising” and “degrading” comment.
The Prime Minister was also criticised this week for accepting a £1,000 bet with broadcaster Piers Morgan on the success of the Government’s Rwanda asylum scheme before the election.
Senior Conservative Mr Gove refused to follow Mr Sunak’s example, saying: “I don’t have that sort of money.”
But he insisted “we absolutely will” get flights carrying asylum seekers off the ground to the east African nation before the general election.
I think individuals’ tax affairs are matters for them and I think it’s invidious to look at individual cases
Mr Sunak’s tax affairs are facing scrutiny after the publication of his tax summary showed he paid around £508,000 in UK tax last year while his total income rose to £2.2 million.
The super-wealthy Prime Minister’s effective tax rate of 23% was the same rate paid by a teacher on a salary of £41,600 per year, despite raking in millions more.
That is because most of his earnings were in the form of capital gains, which is taxed at a lower rate than income.
Housing Secretary Mr Gove was asked about the optics of Mr Sunak paying a headline rate that is less proportionately than a nurse pays.
He replied: “I think individuals’ tax affairs are matters for them and I think it’s invidious to look at individual cases.
“People will make a judgment about what’s called the political optics of something.
“From my point of view, the most important thing is, are we helping working people.”
