European countries feel that Uefa's mere 16 places in a 48-team World Cup are not enough, amid some disquiet about the nature of having home advantage for play-offs of such immense stakes.
Some senior officials have been describing the latter as "extremely unfair", and feel neutral venues could be explored for the future. It is a situation that could also be influenced by having more teams.
With this World Cup expanding to 48 teams for the first time, Uefa was given a mere three extra places, going up from 13 to 16. It is understood that this has been a long-running issue for European associations, who do not feel that increase is fair representation.
Such arguments have nevertheless fallen on deaf ears so far. Other continents point to how Europe is still by far the best represented continent, with 16 sides, although South America has six of its 10 teams in the competition. Europe has just 16 of 55.
A moral historical point is also made about how this is essentially a correction of decades when European countries dominated representation, and that a greater distribution of places is needed to help develop the game in the rest of the world. The counterpoint to that is that if one of Fifa's aims is to increase revenue for wider good, a bigger European country is likely to be more lucrative than one of the smaller populated Concacaf teams that qualify, and that the entertainment quality of the event would be less diluted. It is also felt that the proportions should be the same as for the Club World Cup.
In a much more political argument, it is pointed to how Asia and Africa now represent Fifa president Gianni Infantino's voter base, and that he doesn't enjoy the same support in Europe. It is consequently seen as highly unlikely that places are apportioned to Uefa.
The debate about home advantage in these play-offs is more specifically a Uefa issue, however, since it is they who come up with the system that Fifa then approve.
Of the 12 individual European play-offs over the past week - eight semi-finals and four finals - eight were won by the home team.
Some officials now hope that this will be addressed, so that neutral venues are used in future. A number feel that it is extraordinarily "unfair" that a prize of such stakes - really, the biggest in international football - should involve one team enjoying home advantage.
Uefa are viewed as unlikely to revert to two-legged qualifiers due to the lack of space in the calendar.
This system was first used for the Euro 2020 qualifiers, as an adaptation to the introduction of the Nations League. Qualifying groups were shortened, with the greater number of top-two teams then requiring play-offs to also be staggered, so that previously two-legged individual match-ups became staggered semi-final systems. The structure has since been used for the 2022 and 2026 World Cups, as well as Euro 2024.
That is unlikely to be changed for World Cups due to how the European countries do actively want the higher revenues that come from the Nations League. It is nevertheless hoped that neutral venues will be discussed for future play-offs.
Uefa themselves have been in ongoing discussions over how to evolve qualification for the European Championships, with the exact format for 2028 to be confirmed in May.
Italy fail to qualify for third consecutive World Cup after more play-off heartbreak
Who has qualified for World Cup 2026?
World Cup 2026 fixtures: Full schedule, venues and kick-off times after play-off winners confirmed
Predicting England’s starting XI at the World Cup
Buffon confirms Italy’s immediate plan after disastrous World Cup qualifying failure
England latest: Star players face nervous pre-World Cup wait after ‘painful’ defeat
