Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Elizabeth Nolan Brown

Court Says Prostitution Law Doesn't Violate First Amendment but Language Should Be Interpreted Narrowly

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has upheld the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA). In a decision released Friday, the appeals court affirmed a lower court's ruling that upheld FOSTA in full, agreeing with the government that the 2018 law is neither overbroad nor unconstitutionally vague. But in a partial win for civil liberties and sex worker rights' groups, the court also endorsed a narrow interpretation of FOSTA's prohibition on promoting or facilitating prostitution.

The law "does not proscribe facilitating prostitution more generally, which could extend to speech arguing for the legalization of prostitution or that discusses, educates, or informs about prostitution," the court said.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.