Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
We Got This Covered
We Got This Covered
Jaymie Vaz

Cornell Seven case has exposed how disturbingly misunderstood consent still is — no means no. Why does that still need explaining?

The Cornell Seven case has colored my last few weeks with shock, disappointment, and above all, anger, taking over my social feed and my friends’ groups. Looking over the transcripts and news reports about how Jane Doe felt coerced, about how she claimed to have pushed them away and said no, I got angry too. Yes, these are just allegations and unproven thus far, what continues to bother me is how conversations around consent are getting twisted.

The people who seemed to excuse or minimize the situation got to me. Those who said, ‘Oh, but when she said no, they stopped.’ I got angry at the people who were saying things like, ‘Well, she went there in the middle of the night, drunk. She asked for it.’ Somewhere along the way, however, I began to wonder why they were saying these things. Isn’t the concept of consent clear?

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.