Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Congressman Questions Intent Behind Handling Of Classified Information

Joe Biden U.S. President Joe Biden holds an event about the economy, at the White House in Washington

During a recent hearing, Congressman Andy Biggs raised concerns regarding the handling of classified information by President Biden. Biggs pointed out instances where Biden may have displayed 'guilty knowledge' of classified material, suggesting a level of intent rather than mere negligence or accident.

Biggs referenced a specific incident from 2017 where Biden, in the presence of a ghostwriter, acknowledged the presence of classified documents and cautioned the writer to be careful as the content 'may be classified.' Despite this warning, Biden proceeded to have the material read aloud, indicating a level of awareness regarding the sensitive nature of the information.

The congressman highlighted that the act of forewarning about the classified nature of the material, followed by instructing the ghostwriter to proceed with reading it, could imply a deliberate choice to expose the classified information. Biggs argued that such actions suggest 'guilty knowledge' on Biden's part, indicating a level of intent rather than accidental mishandling.

The discussion during the hearing revolved around the distinction between willful intent and accidental mishandling of classified information. The congressman emphasized that willful behavior entails a conscious decision to act in a certain way, knowing that it is against the law.

While the report presented by the individual being questioned did not find evidence of willfulness in certain instances of document misplacement, Biggs contended that Biden's actions, as described in the 2017 incident, may indicate a different scenario. The congressman's interpretation of Biden's behavior suggested a level of intent and awareness that goes beyond mere negligence or incompetence.

The debate during the hearing underscored differing perspectives on the handling of classified information and the implications of actions that may suggest intent. Biggs' remarks shed light on the complexities of assessing intent in cases involving sensitive material and raised questions about the standards applied to determine willful behavior in such contexts.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.