Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Eugene Volokh

Chief Judge Srinivasan's "Alternate Path" to Upholding the TikTok Divestiture Mandate Against First Amendment Challenge

Here are some excerpts from Chief Judge Srinivasan's opinion concurring in the judgment as to the First Amendment inquiry in Tiktok, Inc. v. Garland. First, Judge Srinivasan stresses the history of restrictions on foreign ownership of electronic communications media:

[C]oncerns about the prospect of foreign control over mass communications channels in the United States are of age-old vintage. In that respect, Congress's decision to condition TikTok's continued operation in the United States on severing Chinese control is not a historical outlier. Rather, it is in line with a historical pattern.

The first communications medium capable of reaching mass audiences in real time—radio—was subject to restrictions on foreign ownership and control from the very outset. The Radio Act of 1912 required radio operators engaged in interstate (or international) communications to obtain a license from the Secretary of Commerce and Labor, but Congress made licenses available only to U.S. citizens or companies. Congress then extended the restrictions to encompass foreign control (not just foreign ownership) in the Radio Act of 1927, prohibiting licensing of any company if it had a foreign officer or director or if one-fifth of its capital stock was in foreign hands.

Within a few years, the Communications Act of 1934 shored up the restrictions on foreign control. Section 310 of the law incorporated with little change the 1927 Act's foreign-control requirements, and also gave the newly created Federal Communications Commission (FCC) authority to withhold a license if a company is "directly or indirectly controlled" by a foreign-dominated parent company. In urging Congress to adopt the additional restrictions on foreign control, the Navy conveyed its concerns that foreign-controlled stations could "be employed in espionage work and in the dissemination of subversive propaganda." The FCC has described Section 310's original purpose as "protect[ing] the integrity of ship-to-shore and governmental communications" from foreign interference and "thwart[ing] the airing of foreign propaganda on broadcast stations."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.