Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Independent UK
The Independent UK
World
Justin Rohrlich

Baseball fan sues Dodgers, claiming he’s the rightful owner of Shohei Ohtani’s historic 51st stolen base

Shohei Ohtani’s historic 50th and 51st stolen bases last season are at the center of a dispute between the team and a South Carolina man - (Getty)

A South Carolina baseball fan is suing the world-champion Los Angeles Dodgers over superstar Shohei Ohtani’s record-setting 51st stolen base, claiming he is the rightful owner of the priceless item — and wants a federal judge to force the team to hand it over.

“The facts are very simple,” attorney Richard Roth, who is representing the fan, told The Independent. “He’s entitled to that base, and we’re going to either get the base back, or we’ll get the value of the base. And the base now is very valuable.”

The dispute can be traced back to mid-September, when Ohtani was on the cusp of becoming the first-ever member of Major League Baseball’s 50/50 club, by hitting 50 home runs and stealing 50 bases in a single season. With Ohtani at that point having notched 48 homers and 49 stolen bases, Greenville, South Carolina medical office manager James Gossett knew it was highly likely that “Shotime” would soon make history.

Major League Baseball teams rotate out their bases a few times per game, replacing each with fresh white ones. The used bases, along with all manner of balls, bats, helmets, and beyond can then be sold as “game-used” collectibles. Everyday bases can sell for less than $100; Ohtani’s 50th stolen base, if it were to ever even appear on the market, could conceivably go for untold amounts.

Gossett knew that whenever Ohtani were to steal his 50th base, the priceless keepsake would be taken out of the game and given to him. But other bases to be used during the game were listed at $2,500.

Shohei Ohtani is beloved in Los Angeles, where this year he had one of the best seasons in baseball history (Getty Images)

On September 18, about a half-hour before the Dodgers were set to play the second of three away games against the Miami Marlins, Gossett’s lawsuit says he emailed the Marlins’ game-used memorabilia sales department about purchasing a piece to add to his personal collection.

He told the Marlins rep, “What I want is the base that Ohtani takes off from when he steal[s] number 50. I know he wants the base he stole... But I want the base he left from. This is for a special gift for someone, thanks. Please let me know we are good. If that’s tonight or tomorrow that’s the base I want and I will pay the $2500.”

After some back-and-forth, the sales rep replied, “Understood. If it happens today or tomorrow, yes.”

“Ok thank you. So it’s a done deal and mine if he does it today or tomorrow, correct?” Gossett wrote back, according to the suit.

“Yes sir!” the rep told Gossett. “The only reason I am not invoicing you now is because we would prefer it happens first. That way we don’t need to run a refund after the fact.”

Global superstar Shohei Ohtani’s feats make headlines across the world (Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved)

The September 18 game went by without a stolen base for Ohtani. However, in the first inning of the September 19 game, Ohtani stole third — leaving from second base — for his 50th steal of the season.

An elated Gossett emailed the Marlins game-used memorabilia rep immediately, writing, “Yes He did it!!!! Ohhh my. 1st inning, 2nd base. Please email me right back to verify you will have your hands on that bag.”

“Second base at the time of #50 has been pulled and set aside for you,” the Marlins rep replied, according to the lawsuit. “Will invoice later tonight.”

Still, something apparently got lost in translation, and Gossett’s suit says second base, the one Ohtani vacated on his way to third, was inexplicably never pulled off the field for him. In the very next inning, Ohtani hit a single, then stole second base, immediately turning the previously “ordinary” base into Ohtani’s 51st stolen base.

One inning after Ohtani stole his 50th base for the season, he stole his 51st (Getty Images)

Ohtani would go on to hit his 49th, 50th, and 51st home runs later in the same game, and turning in what has been called the best single-game performance since the sport was invented.

On September 20, Gossett, who remained unaware that his base hadn’t been removed after steal number 50, emailed the Marlins to find out why he hadn’t yet received an invoice for it.

“Good morning Kevin, I am very sorry to inform you that the base you were interested in purchasing, 2nd base at the time of Ohtani’s 50th steal, is not available for purchase,” the game-used sales rep wrote back. “The base went to the Los Angeles Dodgers. The reason for this was that base would subsequently become stolen base #51, one inning later. I had not been previously been made aware that the ball club would receive SB#51, nor of course that the vacated base in steal #50 would also be steal #51. Please let me know if there is anything else I can assist you with. Thank you.”

Gossett and the Marlins “had a contract for the sale of the base,” according to the lawsuit, which accuses the Marlins of breaching that contract, and the Dodgers of interfering with it.

All MLB teams sell game-used bases to fans, who have created a massive market for authentic memorabilia (Getty Images)

“The base is wrongfully detained by the Los Angeles Dodgers who came into possession of the base from its original owner, the Marlins,” the lawsuit states, demanding the base be turned over to Gossett and noting that Ohtani’s 50th home run ball from the same game was sold at auction last month for an eyewatering $4.4 million. (His 51st home run ball went for “only” $427,000.)

If the Marlins had properly pulled second base from the game after Ohtani’s 50th stolen base, “it would’ve been a different base for number 51,” and this dispute would not exist, Roth told The Independent.

A Dodgers official said on Thursday that the team had no comment. The Marlins did not respond to a request for comment.

“The bottom line is, there was a contract,” Roth said. “The Marlins said, ‘We have a deal, we’ll invoice you,’ and the next thing [my client] knows, they say, ‘You know what, we’re giving [the base] to the Dodgers.’ That’s nonsense. You can’t do that.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.