AI is entering an 'unprecedented regime.' Should we stop it — and can we — before it destroys us?

An illustration of a humanoid robot facing an apocalyptic scene on his left and a utopian scene on his right.

In 2024, Scottish futurist David Wood was part of an informal roundtable discussion at an artificial intelligence (AI) conference in Panama, when the conversation veered to how we can avoid the most disastrous AI futures. His sarcastic answer was far from reassuring.

First, we would need to amass the entire body of AI research ever published, from Alan Turing's 1950 seminal research paper to the latest preprint studies. Then, he continued, we would need to burn this entire body of work to the ground. To be extra careful, we would need to round up every living AI scientist — and shoot them dead. Only then, Wood said, can we guarantee that we sidestep the "non-zero chance" of disastrous outcomes ushered in with the technological singularity — the "event horizon" moment when AI develops general intelligence that surpasses human intelligence.