Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Sport
Sean Ingle

Yorkshire cricket racism hearing: Michael Vaughan gives evidence – as it happened

Michael Vaughan arrives at the International Arbitration Centre in London on Friday.
Michael Vaughan arrives at the International Arbitration Centre in London on Friday. Photograph: James Manning/PA

Paul Lunt, Michael Vaughan’s solicitor, takes the stand.

He is the final witness to be called. There’s a short chat, where Lunt is asked a few questions about how he obtained Liz Neto’s witness statement. He says Michael Vaughan gave it to him, but doesn’t know how he obtained it. He also confirms he interacted with the journalist George Dobell but a long time ago. However, the exchanges appear largely inconsequential in the grand scheme of things.

And that, I think, is it for today in terms of the public hearing.

Liz Neto, the former Yorkshire HR manager takes the stand.

As she does so, journalists are given a copy of her nine-page witness statement. All bar two paragraphs are redacted.

What we can see is the following: “When the media furore was at its zenith, Mr Rashid phoned me on more than one occasion. He appeared distressed and indicated to me he was being pressured to corroborate allegations of racism then being made, even though he did not want me. He said to me, more than once, that he could not remember the particular comment he was being asked to say he witnessed, not anything racist being said in his presence.”

“Mr Rashid’s voluntary comments to me during telephone calls he chose to make to me are at odds with claims I have seen subsequently in the media, attributed to him, concerning racist comments observed or overheard.”

Under cross-examination by Jane Mulcahy, Neto is asked whether she really never saw any racism in Yorkshire cricket. “As far as I was aware,” she replies. “No one ever raised it with me.”

Do you accept now that from the admissions, that even though you were not present, racist language was routinely used? “I accept it was used given Mr Ballance and Mr Hoggard’s admissions, but not routinely used,” replies Neto.

Neto is next asked about Adil Rashid’s comments yesterday, in which he said Neto had misunderstood his comments to her about Rafiq pressuring him. Does she accept that she got it wrong? “Absolutely not.”

Maculy concedes there is a difference of opinion. And with that Neto ends her evidence.

Updated

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.