Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - US
The Guardian - US
Comment
Rajan Menon

Yes, Ukraine needs weapons. But what if supplying them could prove catastrophic?

Ukrainian service member holds a Javelin missile system at a position on the front line in the north Kyiv region, on 13 March.
‘Providing Ukraine even more arms may well produce the results its proponents anticipate. But what if Putin orders his generals to bomb the supply routes from Poland and Romania, the Nato countries that have the longest borders with Ukraine?’ Photograph: Gleb Garanich/Reuters

The United States and some of its Nato allies – Britain, Poland and the Baltic trio – have been the most vigorous in insisting that Ukraine must, for moral and strategic reasons, receive the weapons it needs to fight Russian aggression.

The moral case, strengthened by Ukrainians’ valiant resistance and President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s Churchillian wartime leadership, is that Ukraine is the victim, Russia the aggressor.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.