Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Sun-Times
National
Letters to the Editor

Why the SAFE-T Act’s no-cash bail provision is clearly unconstitutional

An inmate at the Cook County Jail is escorted through a doorway by a security guard in 2014 in Chicago. (Charles Rex Arbogast/AP)

In 1995, I was the assistant public defender, now retired, who unsuccessfully argued before the Illinois Supreme Court that the no-bail provision of the stalking statute was unconstitutional.

As Judge Thomas W. Cunnington wrote in his Dec. 28 memorandum of decision holding the SAFE-T Act unconstitutional — the implementation of which has been placed on hold by the Illinois Supreme Court pending its review of Cunnington’s ruling — the unconstitutionality of the SAFE-T Act flows from two provisions of the Illinois Constitution. 

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.