I sympathise with much of Simon Jenkins’ reasoning on why King Charles should confirm his presence at celebrations of the US’s declaration of independence, but ultimately come to a different conclusion (The king’s visit to the US must go ahead despite Trump’s terrible military aggression, 13 March). As Jenkins points out: “Separating headship of state from daily politics is a virtue of hereditary monarchy.” I am just not convinced that the king’s host will be capable of understanding that level of subtlety. He will instead see what he wants to see: a king come to pay tribute to him personally. We should have no part of that and should not expect our king to have any part either.
We can think about a visit once the would-be monarch of America apologises for his most recent slights on our nation, most notably on the men and women who fought and died in support of his nation’s cause that he so easily dismissed.
Nicholas Avery
Felixstowe, Suffolk
