Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
Aaratrika Bhaumik

Why did the Supreme Court stay a High Court verdict declaring U.P. madarsa law ‘unconstitutional’? | Explained

The story so far: The Supreme Court on April 5 stayed the operation of the Allahabad High Court’s decision declaring the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 (Act) unconstitutional. The legislation allowed the State government to establish the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education to regulate madarsas in the State and impart education from primary to postgraduate and research levels.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra passed the interim stay order, observing that the High Court’s views appeared to be prima facie incorrect and that the object of the statute is merely regulatory in nature.

Notably, after the Bench enquired why the State was not defending the legislation as it had done in the High Court, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) K.M. Nataraj clarified that the Uttar Pradesh government has now learnt to “accept” the High Court’s verdict.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.