Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Conversation
The Conversation
Eli Alshanetsky, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Temple University

Where does human thinking end and AI begin? An AI authorship protocol aims to show the difference

If students can't demonstrate their thinking, how can professors know whether they are learning? SDI Productions via Getty Images

The latest generation of artificial intelligence models is sharper and smoother, producing polished text with fewer errors and hallucinations. As a philosophy professor, I have a growing fear: When a polished essay no longer shows that a student did the thinking, the grade above it becomes hollow – and so does the diploma.

The problem doesn’t stop in the classroom. In fields such as law, medicine and journalism, trust depends on knowing that human judgment guided the work. A patient, for instance, expects a doctor’s prescription to reflect an expert’s thought and training.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.