Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Conversation
The Conversation
Naomi Schalit, Politics and Legal Affairs Editor, The Conversation

What legal experts say about the Trump administration’s attempts to make a federal case out of state elections

The Trump administration argues that if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, left, narrowly loses his reelection bid, it'll be because voters mistakenly voted for Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. AP Mark Thiessen; Becky Bohrer

The Trump administration’s lawsuit against Alaska, which seeks to block certification of the U.S. Senate results there if the GOP candidate does not win, is the latest in a long series of actions throughout 2026 in which the administration has attempted to wrest control of federal elections from states.

In the Alaska case, the U.S. Department of Justice, directed by President Donald Trump, claims that it aims to “protect the integrity of the 2026 Senate election in Alaska.” If incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan does not win reelection, the DOJ asserts, it’s likely the result of voter confusion because another candidate with a very similar name – Daniel J. Sullivan, with no party affiliation – is on the ballot, too. So in the event that Sen. Sullivan fails to win reelection, the DOJ demands that Alaska not certify the election and instead should conduct an inquest into who voters thought they were voting for.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.