The West Virginia Senate, dominated by Republicans, has passed a bill that mandates the viewing of an anti-abortion video in public schools. The video in question, 'Baby Olivia' by Live Action, is intended for eighth and tenth-grade classrooms. However, it has faced criticism from medical professionals and educators who argue that it presents misleading information.
The animated video showcases the stages of fetal development, starting from fertilization and progressing through various embryonic and fetal milestones. Critics have pointed out inaccuracies in the video, such as referring to a 'heartbeat' at six weeks when the embryo does not yet have a heart.
Despite opposition from some lawmakers, the bill has advanced to the House of Delegates for further review. Republican Senate Majority Leader Tom Takubo raised concerns about the video containing scientifically inaccurate information, emphasizing the importance of teaching factual content in schools.
Supporters of the bill, including Republican Sen. Amy Grady, argue that the video serves as a valuable educational tool for students with different learning styles. They maintain that the video is not intended to be political or religious but rather aims to facilitate discussions on the topic of abortion.
Democratic Sen. Mike Woelfel expressed reservations about the bill potentially infringing on First Amendment rights, particularly for students with diverse religious beliefs. He emphasized the need to uphold constitutional principles while addressing sensitive topics like abortion.
In addition to the anti-abortion video requirement, the bill also includes a provision mandating the teaching of the Holocaust and reading of Anne Frank's diary in high school. Live Action, the organization behind 'Baby Olivia,' is dedicated to promoting a 'culture of life' and has invested significant resources in producing and distributing anti-abortion content.
Founder Lila Rose defended the video, stating that it was developed in consultation with medical professionals to provide accurate and informative content. The organization's efforts to influence public opinion on abortion have sparked debates over the appropriateness of using such materials in educational settings.
