Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
World
Angela Giuffrida in Rome

Vatican issues apology over Pope Francis’s ‘homophobic’ slur

Pope Francis seated in white holding papers, with microphone in front
Pope Francis is alleged to have made slur during a closed-door meeting with bishops in Rome last week. Photograph: Guglielmo Mangiapane/Reuters

Pope Francis has apologised for using an offensive slur during a discussion with bishops about admitting gay men into seminaries, saying he “never intended to offend or express himself in homophobic terms”.

The rare papal apology followed reports in the Italian press on Monday that, during the discussion in Rome last week, the pontiff, 87, had said there was already too much “frociaggine” in some seminaries. The Italian word roughly translates as “faggotness”.

Matteo Bruni, the director of the Vatican’s press office, said Francis was aware of the newspaper reports about the closed-door conversation and “apologises to those who felt offended by the use of the term, reported by others”.

“As he stated on several occasions, ‘In the church there is room for everyone, for everyone. Nobody is useless, nobody is superfluous, there is room for everyone. Just as we are, all of us,’” said Bruni. “The pope never intended to offend or express himself in homophobic terms, and apologises to those who felt offended by the use of a term, reported by others.”

The discussion took place during an assembly of the Italian bishops conference (CEI), reportedly aimed at considering the question of whether gay men should be admitted to Catholic seminaries, where priests are trained.

When one of the bishops asked Francis what he should do, the pope reportedly reiterated his objection to admitting gay men, saying that while it was important to embrace everyone, it was likely that a gay person could risk leading a double life. He is then alleged to have used the offensive word.

The story was first reported by the political gossip website Dagospia, before being covered by the Italian dailies La Repubblica and Corriere della Sera, and the news agency Adnkronos.

La Repubblica, Corriere and Adnkronos quoted unnamed bishops, who said that the pontiff meant the derogatory term as a “joke”, and that those around him were surprised and perplexed by the alleged slur. One bishop told Corriere della Sera the Argentinian pontiff may not have been aware the term was offensive.

Since he was elected pope in 2013, Francis has sought to adopt a more inclusive tone towards the LGBTQ+ community in his public statements, much to the disdain of conservative cardinals.

Soon after becoming pope, he famously said in response to a question about gay priests: “Who am I to judge?”

He approved a ruling in December allowing priests to bless unmarried and same-sex couples in a significant change of position for the Catholic church.

However, he has been clear about not allowing gay people to join the clergy. In an interview in 2018 he said he was “concerned” about what he described as the “serious issue” of homosexuality and that being gay was a “fashion” to which the clergy was susceptible.

“In our societies it even seems that homosexuality is fashionable, and that mentality, in some way, also influences the life of the church,” he said at the time.

The Roman Catholic church’s position is that homosexual acts are sinful. A decree on training for priests in 2016 emphasised the obligation of sexual abstinence, as well as barring gay men and those who support “gay culture” from holy orders.

Papal apologies are usually issued in the hope of righting “historical wrongs” of the church rather than immediate personal mea culpas, said Christopher White, Vatican reporter for the National Catholic reporter.

“Papal apologies, while not unprecedented, tend to be for historical wrongs. John Paul II famously apologised for the way the church historically treated women and the Jewish people; both he and Benedict XVI and Francis have all had to issue repeated mea culpas for the church’s shameful record on clergy abuse,” he said.

“This apology from Francis is noticeable for the immediate about-face, which is probably attributed to the internet age, and also for how inconsistent the pope’s offensive language was with his general record of LGBTQ outreach and his desire not to undo the bridge building work he seems to sincerely be engaged in.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.