A special court for National Investigation Agency (NIA) cases cannot cancel bail granted to a person, accused of attempting to establish Islamic rule in India through unlawful means, just because he was subsequently suspected to be a Sri Lankan national, the Madras High Court has held.
A Division Bench of Justices S.S. Sundar and Sunder Mohan allowed an appeal and set aside a bail cancellation order passed by the special court which had observed that Section 43D(7) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) of 1967 does not permit grant of bail to a foreigner.
However, the Bench pointed out that Section 43D(7) states that no bail should be granted to a person accused of an offence punishable under UAPA if he was not an Indian citizen and had entered the country unauthorisedly or illegally except in exceptional circumstances and for reasons to be recorded in writing.
Therefore, “it is not as if that there is no discretion given to the court. The court can grant bail even to a person who is not a citizen under extraordinary circumstances,” the Bench said and pointed out that in the instant case the appellant Mohamed Rifas alias Mohamed Rigbas was only suspected to be a foreign national.
The appellant’s counsel I. Abdul Basith brought it to the notice of the Bench that his client was arrested by the Keelakarai police in April 2018 for offences under the UAPA, Indian Penal Code as well as the Arms Act, 1959 and was granted bail in July 2018. Subsequently, the NIA took over the investigation in 2019.
After completion of investigation, a charge sheet was filed in 2021. Thereafter, in 2022, the NIA sought cancellation of bail citing another FIR registered against the appellant by the Keelakarai police in November 2019 under the Foreigners Act of 1946, the Passport Act of 1967 and the Citizenship Act of 1955.
The investigating agency claimed that the appellant had suppressed his nationality while obtaining bail in July 2018 and therefore the relief granted to him must be cancelled. The special court accepted the submission and cancelled the July 5, 2018 bail order on July 22, 2022.
Not in agreement with the decision taken by the special court, the Division Bench pointed out that the NIA slueths ought to have approached the High Court and not the special court for cancellation of bail since the latter was not empowered to review its own bail order.
Authoring the verdict, Justice Mohan refused to accept NIA’s explanation that it could not approach the High Court because the limitation period had expired. “We are unable to countenance this submission because inability to file an appeal cannot be a ground to file cancellation of bail petition,” the Bench said.
It also pointed out that NIA had no independent material to establish that the appellant was indeed a Sri Lankan national who had entered India illegally but for relying upon the 2019 case booked by the Keelakarai police which was yet to complete the investigation and file a charge sheet.
“Even assuming that the appellant is a Sri Lankan national, as stated earlier, the appellant has been granted bail in the year 2018 and his liberty cannot be curtailed after four years, merely because there is an FIR that was registered in 2019,” the Bench concluded.
Ends
