Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Business
Graeme Wearden

IMF warns markets are underestimating geopolitical risks; UK faces a ‘narrow path’ on debt reduction – as it happened

Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange.
Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters

Closing poost

Time to wrap up: here are today’s main stories.

Firstly, on the IMF’s annual meetings in Washington DC today:

The UK public finances…

And also:

Larry Elliott: IMF may be upbeat, but it knows where dangers lurk

The IMF has identified three risks to its forecast for 3.2% global growth in the next two years, my colleague Larry Elliott writes:

First, there’s a risk that central banks will be too slow in reducing borrowing costs, leading to slower growth and a reassessment by financial markets of their Goldilocks scenario for the global economy. Markets have bought heavily into the idea that central banks will get policy just right, engineering a return of inflation to targets without a recession. That may be true in the US, it looks less clearcut for the eurozone.

The second risk is that the war in the Middle East escalates and leads to a sharp increase in oil prices. So far, commodity markets have been relaxed about the heightened tension because they see no immediate danger of crude supplies being cut off, but that could rapidly change. Gourinchas said: “An escalation in regional conflicts, especially in the Middle East, could pose serious risks for commodity markets.” It is a warning worth heeding.

Finally, there’s the elephant in the room – the possibility that Donald Trump will return to the White House after next month’s US presidential election. While not mentioning the former president by name, the IMF estimates that a shift towards “undesirable” industrial and trade policies could reduce global GDP by 0.5 percentage points in 2026.

As far as the IMF is concerned, imposing trade barriers and subsidising domestic industry provides a sugar rush but the measures often lead to retaliation and fail to improve living standards in the longer term.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.