Amanda Zurawski, a Texas woman suing the state after being denied an abortion, told senators that the denial of care damaged her mental health and potentially "robbed" her of the opportunity to have children in the future, according to CNN.
She addressed absent Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, telling them she "nearly died on their watch" because of the anti-abortion policies that they support during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on reproductive rights post-Dobbs, the Supreme Court decision that overturned the federal right to abortion last summer.
"We've heard a lot today about the mental trauma and the negative harmful effects on a person's psychological well-being after they have an abortion, supposedly, and I'm curious why that's not relevant for me as well," Zurawski said.
"Because I wasn't permitted to have an abortion and the trauma and the PTSD and the depression that I have dealt with in the eight months since this happened to me is paralyzing," she added. "On top of that, I am still struggling to have children."
During hearing on Texas abortion pill, Amanda Zurawski on Texas Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn: "What happened to me...was horrific, but it's a direct result of the policies that they support. I nearly died on their watch..." pic.twitter.com/AyGk0Y9tNd
— CSPAN (@cspan) April 26, 2023
Zurawski was reportedly denied an abortion following pregnancy complications 18 weeks into her pregnancy. Her water broke, leaving her at a high risk of contracting a deadly infection and fatally threatening the life of her baby. Because the child still had a heartbeat, Zurawksi's doctors refused to terminate the pregnancy, citing Texas law.
Her doctors only administered abortion care after she went into septic shock, she told the committee, adding that she may have been one of the first Texas patients affected by the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
She is also one of five women currently suing Texas for pain and suffering after being denied abortion care amidst dangerous pregnancy complications due to the state's restrictive and aggressive abortion laws.
Their language is "incredibly vague, and it leaves doctors grappling with what they can and cannot do, what health care they can and cannot provide," Zurawski said, in response to implications that her doctors were to blame. "And if they make the wrong the decision, they face up to 99 years in prison and/or losing their license."
Dr. Ingrid Skop, a Texas obstetrician-gynecologist and GOP witness hailed to give her opinion on Zurawski's experience by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., apologized to Zurawski for her loss and her doctor's misunderstanding.
"And I am so sorry that your doctors misunderstood Texas law," she said. "Every single law allows an exclusion for a doctor to use their reasonable medical judgment to determine when to intervene in a medical emergency, which is usually defined as a threat to the life of the mother or permanent irreversible damage to an organ or an organ system."
She added that even prior to the Supreme Court decision, doctors knew how to assess medical emergencies and offer abortions when needed, citing the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology's guidance on how to do so for patients in Zurawski's situation.
Sen. Cornyn, R-Texas, later weighed in, suggesting that Zurawski should consider pursuing a medical malpractice suit against her doctors.
"Dr. Skop is not my physician. She has never been my physician. She has never treated me. She has not seen my medical records," Zurawski said later in the hearing, addressing both Skop and Cornyn's comments.
"Quite frankly, my physician and my team of health care professionals that I saw over the course of three days, while I was repeatedly turned away from health care access, made the decision to not provide an abortion because that's what they felt they had to do under Texas' law. And that will continue to happen and it is continuing to happen, and it's not a result of misinterpretation. It's the result of confusion and the confusion is because the way the law is written."