A Donald Trump supporter who repeatedly insisted E. Jean Carroll had 'no evidence' against the US president was forced to confront a glaring weakness in her argument during a heated online debate: she had not read the court documents and said her research into the case came from TikTok.
The exchange took a dramatic turn when the woman, who had initially questioned Carroll's allegations and suggested she was motivated by money, eventually admitted she needed to conduct more research. By the end of the discussion, she acknowledged that her position had been 'fuelled by emotion more than fact.'
