Lawyers representing former President Trump have requested a delay in his sentencing hearing in the New York v. Trump case, citing concerns of election interference. Trump was recently found guilty on all counts of falsifying business records in a high-profile trial following an investigation by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
The sentencing, initially scheduled for July 11, was already postponed to September 18. However, Trump's legal team is now seeking a further delay until after the 2024 Presidential election, arguing for dismissal based on presidential immunity for official acts.
Trump's attorney, Todd Blanche, raised objections regarding statements made by Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz about the case, as well as the judge's daughter's association with a firm representing Democratic candidates. Blanche emphasized the importance of the election and urged the court to avoid rushing the sentencing process.
Blanche's arguments for dismissal centered on the Supreme Court's ruling that a former president is immune from prosecution for official acts while in office. He claimed that evidence presented during the trial included official White House communications, suggesting that the case blurred the line between official and unofficial actions.
The legal maneuvering in the New York v. Trump case reflects the ongoing legal battles surrounding the former president and highlights the complex interplay between legal immunity, election politics, and judicial proceedings. The decision on whether to further delay the sentencing hearing will have significant implications for Trump's legal standing and potential political future.
