Former President Donald Trump's attorneys are not asking to delay the expensive penalties of his civil fraud verdict. They accused New York Attorney General Letitia James of rushing to collect the massive fine. Concerns are growing over Trump's New York real estate empire, with some properties potentially facing seizure if he fails to come up with the necessary funds.
Trump's legal team has requested a 30-day stay on the execution of the $450 million fine. The Attorney General's office swiftly responded, stating that Trump has no grounds for a stay. Earlier, James had expressed readiness to seize Trump's assets, including his buildings, if he cannot meet the financial obligations.
There are mounting concerns about the law used by the Attorney General in the case against Trump. Critics argue that the law, which does not require proof of financial loss, a jury trial, and is easier to prove than typical fraud cases, may be setting a concerning precedent. Stephen Cohen, a former chief of staff to a previous Attorney General, expressed worries about potential misuse of this law in the future.
The discretion of the Attorney General and future officials in applying this law is under scrutiny, with concerns about its potential for abuse. The broader question remains about who might be targeted next under this legal framework, raising uncertainties about its future applications.