Trump Organization Executive Vice President Expresses Disappointment with New York Ruling
In a recent interview, the executive vice president of the Trump Organization shared his thoughts on a recent court ruling that fined him and his brother $4 million each and barred them from operating a business in New York for two years. The executive vice president expressed his disappointment and alleged that the ruling was predetermined and unjust.
The executive vice president stated that he believed the judge ruled against his family before the trial even began, claiming that it was a setup from the start. He criticized the judge's animosity towards his father and described the judge's gaze as filled with hatred. He further asserted that his family's real estate company is successful and has an impeccable track record, emphasizing their consistent loan payments, adherence to covenants, and positive relationship with Deutsche Bank.
He also criticized the attorney general's office, arguing that the attorney general had campaigned on a platform of targeting his father and vowed to sue him relentlessly. The executive vice president asserted that the legal proceedings were unfair and characterized the system as rigged against them. He highlighted the company's responsible actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming that they never missed a loan payment, took care of their employees, and acted as a pillar of support for the local community.
Expressing concern about the state of New York, the executive vice president warned potential businesses to be cautious about moving there. He lamented the alleged decline of the state, stating that companies are fleeing while his family's company has contributed significantly to the city's economy through tax payments and employment opportunities.
Despite the unfavorable ruling, the executive vice president expressed determination to fight and win on appeal. He criticized the judge's decision, citing the appellate court's previous victories on certain aspects of the case, specifically mentioning the statute of limitations. He suggested that the judge's ruling was an attempt to punish his family before retiring.
The executive vice president also alleged that the legal actions against his family were politically motivated, claiming that they were targeted due to his father's presidential bid and the success of his movement. He stated that these legal actions were part of a pattern, including past impeachment proceedings and investigations, aimed at undermining and discrediting his father.
The executive vice president concluded by expressing his belief that the country is better than the current state of affairs, calling for a halt to these alleged unfair tactics and stating his confidence in prevailing over the legal challenges they face.
It is important to note that the claims made by the executive vice president have not been independently verified at this time.
