Private wealth has become an operational arm of the Trump presidency, bankrolling pet projects and policies on a scale unmatched by any previous administration.
Why it matters: The generosity of America's billionaires can't be divorced from the tax incentives and exclusive access that come from orbiting — or serving in — the wealthiest administration in U.S. history.
While some donations are earmarked for the public good — like Michael Dell's historic $6.25 billion gift on Tuesday for "Trump accounts" for kids — many flow into the president's personal ecosystem.
- Taxpayer dollars are therefore spared for projects such as the new White House ballroom, but the danger becomes a government more accountable to private patrons than the public interest.
Zoom in: Like any private philanthropy, Dell's massive donation — which will seed 25 million child investment accounts with $250 — is ultimately dwarfed by the $7 trillion federal budget.
- But its power lies in its ability to bypass congressional gridlock, allowing Trump to broaden a popular benefit — $1,000 for newborns starting next year — far beyond what lawmakers were willing or able to authorize.
- The same dynamic applied to GOP megadonor Timothy Mellon's $130 million contribution to backstop troop salaries during the government shutdown, which worked out to about $100 per service member.
What they're saying: "This gift is being made possible by the largest tax cuts in American history, which our Republican majorities passed earlier this year," President Trump said alongside Dell on Tuesday.
- "Thanks to President Trump's leadership, America's richest billionaires are giving away their money to Make America Great Again — from investing in Trump Accounts for our children's future to supporting our troops. Democrats could only dream of accomplishing this," White House spokesman Kush Desai told Axios in a statement.
Zoom out: Many wealthy donors have chosen to support projects insulated from the federal balance sheet. In Trump's world, that often means financing the spaces and spectacles he values most.
1. Inauguration: Unburdened by campaign-finance limits, Trump's 2025 inaugural committee raised a record-shattering $245 million — nearly triple his 2017 total and four times President Biden's 2021 haul.
- The committee raised more money from donors giving at least $1 million than any previous inauguration raised in total — a historic concentration of big-money influence, according to a Brennan Center analysis.
- In a break from precedent, Trump's transition also was financed by private donors — a 46-person roster of billionaires, future Cabinet members and appointees disclosed for the first time last month.
2. Military parade: Sponsors for Trump's 250th-anniversary Army parade in June included corporations with deep financial or political ties to the president, including Palantir, Coinbase and Oracle.
- Ethics lawyers warned the sponsorships — at an event estimated to cost up to $45 million — created the appearance of the U.S. government endorsing Trump-aligned brands and granting access to industries his administration actively regulates.
- UFC president Dana White, who sponsored the parade in his personal capacity, expects a multimillion-dollar budget for next summer's fight card on the White House lawn — an exclusive America250 event for well-connected elites and foreign dignitaries.
3. White House ballroom: Trump has broken ground on a 90,000-square-foot ballroom replacing part of the East Wing. He says the project will be paid for entirely with his own money and private donations.
- So far, the White House has disclosed a list of 37 corporate and individual contributors, including major tech companies, defense contractors, crypto firms and longtime Trump allies. Some have remained anonymous.
- The price tag has climbed toward $300 million, raising questions about what donors expect in return for helping build the crown jewel of Trump's White House legacy.
The intrigue: JPMorgan Chase declined to donate to the ballroom, with CEO Jamie Dimon telling CNN that the bank couldn't risk any perception of "buying favors" that may invite trouble with "the next DOJ."
Between the lines: Many conservatives see private money and influence as a feature, not a bug — a way to limit government spending and tap outside expertise.
- Take Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, which functioned as in-house consultancy for federal cost-cutting, or Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner's growing role as a peace envoy for Gaza and Ukraine.
- The bigger question is whether a government shaped by private actors — however efficient — can still claim to be acting in the public's interest.
What to watch: Trump told reporters that he's been speaking to wealthy associates about funding a new monument — a triumphal arc near the Lincoln Memorial — as part of America's 250th anniversary celebrations.
