West Ham United are performing well below their predicted points score according to xG, despite their recent victory over Wolves.
According to expected goals data, West Ham, who lie in 15th place with seven points, are actually 3.74 points worse off than expected.
With five goals scored and nine conceded in eight games, the Hammers are well below where they would like to be.
But the “expected points” Premier League table would actually suggest they are picking up worse results than their performances deserve. West Ham are the most underperforming side in the league, with their seven points in eight games well below the 10.74 expectation.
READ MORE: Areola says confidence is growing at West Ham after Wolves and Anderlecht wins
For example, in their 1-0 defeat to Everton, West Ham’s xG of 0.66 was actually better than their opponents, who managed 0.40, suggesting West Ham should have picked up at least a draw based on the quality of chances created. A league based on xG score lines would put West Ham in 8th place.
Elsewhere in the league, Fulham are the biggest overperformers, with 11 points from eight games - more than four better than their 6.96 point prediction according to xG. Bournemouth are also doing better than expected, with nine points, 3.86 better than the 5.14 points expected of them. They would actually be at the bottom of the table according to the xG formula.
Leaders Arsenal are another side outperforming expectations on 21 points, having been expected to pick up 17.26, an overperformance of 3.74. Manchester United, who lie in sixth place with 12 points, are actually 2.66 points better off than expected.
Manchester City top the expected points table, with a predicted 20.71 points closely matching their real tally of 20, which shows their performances have matched their impressive results. Liverpool are a side underachieving, with 10 points from seven games, having been expected to pick up 12.81.
Chelsea are doing better than expected, with 13 points, 3.64 above their expected tally of 9.36. Tottenham are also above expectations, picking up 17 points so far while expected to be on 13.88, a gain of 3.12.
Another side with worse results than expected are Nottingham Forest. Bottom of the genuine Premier League table, on four points, Forest are actually expected to be on a far more respectable 7.48 points, which would put them above the bottom three.
Premier League table based on xG predictions:
xG Pos |
Team |
Actual Points |
xPoints |
1 |
Manchester City |
20 |
20.71 |
2 |
Arsenal |
21 |
17.26 |
3 |
Brighton |
14 |
14.12 |
4 |
Tottenham Hotspur |
17 |
13.88 |
5 |
Newcastle United |
11 |
13.33 |
6 |
Liverpool |
10 |
12.81 |
7 |
Brentford |
10 |
12.37 |
8 |
West Ham United |
7 |
10.74 |
9 |
Aston Villa |
8 |
10.24 |
10 |
Chelsea |
13 |
9.36 |
11 |
Manchester United |
12 |
9.34 |
12 |
Southampton |
7 |
9.29 |
13 |
Wolverhampton Wanderers |
6 |
9.17 |
14 |
Leeds United |
9 |
8.83 |
15 |
Everton |
10 |
8.82 |
16 |
Nottingham Forest |
4 |
7.48 |
17 |
Fulham |
11 |
6.96 |
18 |
Crystal Palace |
6 |
6.78 |
19 |
Leicester City |
4 |
6.62 |
20 |
Bournemouth |
9 |
5.14 |
READ NEXT:
Moyes believes Paqueta is the closest thing West Ham have had to Payet
Gianluca Scamacca and Lucas Paqueta justify summer price tags in West Ham’s Anderlecht win
Every word West Ham’s David Moyes said on Anderlecht win, Gianluca Scamacca and Flynn Downes
How West Ham can qualify for the last 16 of the Europa Conference League against Anderlecht
West Ham player ratings: Flynn Downes stars as Gianluca Scamacca scores vital goal in Anderlecht