Last Friday's opinion for the Court in Learning Resources v. Trump was mercifully short. The full stack of opinions, not so much.
The dueling opinions give us academic types lots of interesting material to chew on, including what to make of the fact that four separate opinions embrace the major questions doctrine, but do so in different ways, and how to assess Justice Thomas' suggestion that the nondelegation doctrine should be understood as much as a matter of due process as Article I vesting.
In the meantime, Learning Resources is an unquestionably important opinion. I wrote up some of my initial thoughts for Civitas Outlook. My column begins:
