Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Fortune
Fortune
Terri R. Kurtzberg, Mason Ameri

The return-to-office wars could end in a stalemate as we all reach the same conclusion about what the flexible future of work means

(Credit: Benjamin Girette - Bloomberg - Getty Images)

The DNA of work has changed–or, rather, the point of engagement. A deadly virus sent us scrambling for safety and jobs that didn’t seem well suited for working from home (WFH) suddenly were happening in just that way–and more successfully than anticipated. Eventually, returning to the office (RTO) became possible, and many an executive declared that productivity relied on face-to-face interactions. But the workforce has spoken, and sitting in a cubicle for extensive hours five days a week isn’t the way forward.

Battle lines have been drawn between the RTO and WFH camps. Some executives stand on their soapboxes and insist that the creative process happens only over the literal water cooler. Workers say that flexibility is a right and the most productive way forward. Ironically enough, both groups are leaning toward similar policies, with many requiring three days a week in the office and approving two from home. Even the extreme butts-in-seats chief executives often now push for 80% time in, not 100%.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.