Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Latin Times
Latin Times
Politics
Mateo Moreno

The Rational Behind Each Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Voting For or Against Merging the Moraes, STF Case

Brazil's Federal Supreme Court (STF) minister Alexandre de Moraes gestures during the voting session to convict or acquit far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro (2019-2022) in a coup trial at the Federal Supreme Court in Brasilia on September 10, 2025. (Credit: Photo by Evaristo Sa / AFP) (Photo by EVARISTO SA/AFP via Getty Images)

  • The shouting match that forced Chief Justice Edson Fachin to intervene on September 15 broke out between Justices Gilmar Mendes and André Mendonça — and it started right after Gilmar defended Prosecutor General Paulo Gonet from suspicion, then pivoted straight into attacking Mendonça.

  • The session ended in a provisional 4-4 tie on whether to merge the Moraes and Mendonça cases; Justice Flávio Dino's request to review the file froze the question with no return date set.
  • Moraes's defense rests on a granular claim about phone forensics: of 52 notes federal police pulled from banker Daniel Vorcaro's device, 47 match no WhatsApp exchange at all, and only 5 are linked — by the timing of a screenshot, not by content — to a saved contact.

Below is a justice-by-justice breakdown of the legal reasoning nine members of Brazil's Supreme Federal Court (STF) laid out on September 15 in the case touching Justice Alexandre de Moraes and his contacts with jailed banker Daniel Vorcaro, plus an account of the shouting match between Justices Gilmar Mendes and André Mendonça.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.