This article is part of The Conversation’s series looking at Labor’s jobs summit. Read the other articles in the series here.
The greatest workforce challenge Australia faces is in health, an issue that will likely be with us for another decade.
Shortages of health workers reduce access to care, increase waiting times and reduce patient safety. They can even increase avoidable deaths.
However, we don’t need the upcoming Jobs and Skills Summit to solve this problem. There is already low-hanging fruit to pick.
We need to broaden the scope of practice for some health workers, engage in better workforce planning, and reform how existing and new resources are deployed.
Read more: General practices are struggling. Here are 5 lessons from overseas to reform the funding system
Health workers burnt out and leaving
Burnt-out health workers leaving the workforce are a key driver of a rise in job vacancies across Australia.
While much of this is due to the unprecedented nature of COVID, Australia has had problems staffing its health-care system for years. The workforce shortage is particularly acute in rural and remote regions.
The natural response is to throw money at the problem but the Australian government has little spare cash. Its budget deficit is projected to be more than A$800 billion by 2025-26. State governments are also cash-strapped.
More immigration of skilled health workers may also have limited success. Australia will be competing with countries including New Zealand, Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, which are looking to fill their own health worker shortages.
Health workers could take on more roles
Health worker registration, along with standards and protocols, are essential for ensuring safe and effective care. However, this also stops health workers taking on new roles typically performed by others.
The potential for broadening health workers’ roles has been discussed for more than two decades. There has been some progress. Pharmacists now administer some vaccines, which was traditionally the domain of GPs and nurses.
A broader scope of practice for some health workers can increase people’s access to care, create more job satisfaction for the health worker, and lead to more efficient health care. It could also help the health-care system respond better and quicker to future pandemics or large-scale reform.
Overall, peak organisations and specialist colleges have effectively protected their turf. This may have resulted in more expensive care for the public and the government because it has stopped less-costly health workers from delivering care.
We are now faced with a more serious problem. A broader scope of practice for some health workers is needed to secure timely access to care. That stronger message will help government bash through future turf wars.
Read more: How rivalries between doctors and pharmacists turned into the 'turf war' we see today
New roles for paramedics, pharmacists, physios
Health workers in other countries are becoming more flexible in the scope of tasks they perform.
The UK’s National Health Service has “extended roles”, such as nurses being more involved in managing chronic diseases. There are also “advanced roles”, which require a master’s degree in advanced practice. One example is allowing advanced nurse practitioners to manage people with mental health issues in the community, under the guidance of a psychiatrist.
Australia is also starting to think differently. The ten-year National Medical Workforce Strategy released in 2021 seeks to re-balance from sub-specialisation to a more generalist workforce to improve access to care. The hope is to create more GPs and specialists with additional skills, such as emergency care, and other select specialist skills.
There are opportunities to expand the roles of paramedics, especially in rural and remote regions without enough GPs and nurses.
Paramedics have evolved from delivering emergency care to managing chronic disease, mental health and social care. Additional paramedic education to understand diagnostic tests, prescribe some medicines and deliver wound care could increase patients’ access to health care.
Physiotherapists could be the first point of contact for musculoskeletal conditions. They could give steroid injections and refer patients to orthopaedic specialists.
Pharmacists could also take a greater role, administering medicines over the counter rather than requiring a prescription from GPs.
Sexual health is one area. Allowing women to access the oral contraceptive pill without a prescription would be cost effective with minimal risk. Viagra requires a prescription in Australia but is sold over the counter in the UK.
How do we fund this?
Any health workforce reform to address shortages must ensure quality and safety are maintained and provide at least as good an experience to patients compared to current practice.
It must also be accompanied by supportive funding models.
Nurse practitioners provide a good example. They were introduced in Australia in 1998 to fill doctor shortages, allowing registered nurses with additional education to diagnose, perform procedures and prescribe drugs – within tightly defined parameters.
Today, most nurse practitioners work in public health, particularly emergency departments.
More nurse practitioners aren’t in private practice for a number of reasons, including restricted access to Medicare and pharmaceutical item numbers.
With appropriate funding models, expanding nurse practitioner roles could substantially increase access to care and reduce health-care costs.
Read more: Australia could do so much more with its nurse practitioners
We need better planning
Health workforce shortages are an endemic, multifaceted, cross-jurisdictional problem. COVID has amplified shortages, but poor planning and limited government investment are mostly to blame.
There is an under-supply of specialists in some areas, and oversupply of specialists in others. Redistributing the health workforce, from metropolitan regions to rural and remote regions, would fill some shortages.
Australia also needs another independent agency such as Health Workforce Australia. This was established to support workforce reform initiatives in 2009 but abolished in 2014.
Roles of a new agency should include independently identifying workforce needs across the health-care system, helping coordinate investment in education and training, and providing evidence for broadening workforce scope, retention and reform.
What policies would we need?
The health-care system must also reform to reduce waste and redeploy valuable resources more effectively.
Digital health and other technology advancements offer opportunities to improve workplace productivity, alongside reorganisation of care models.
Reducing bureaucracy and better allocating administration tasks to non-clinical staff can also create more time for clinical care.
Henry Cutler does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
